Home   \   About Us   \   Solutions   \   News and Events \ Contact Us \ Blog
# Wednesday, September 01, 2010

A friend of mine who owns a small business recently informed me that things were picking back up and he was in the process of calling back some of the employees he unfortunately had to let go due to downsizing his staff.  He said he could not necessarily put employees back in the same job they had before, but he did have positions available and felt he should offer these positions to his former employees first.  He mentioned that he was somewhat concerned and somewhat frustrated in some cases because some of the former employees were refusing his job offers. 

He asked me how the state unemployment agencies would view someone currently receiving unemployment benefits and declining offers of work.  Would they still be eligible to receive benefits under state law?  I advised my friend that state laws really vary regarding what offers are considered suitable work and what would be considered good cause for refusing them.  Under Federal Law, a state agency cannot deny an employee benefits based on refusal of work if: (A) the position offered is vacant due directly to a strike, lockout, or other labor dispute; (B) if the wages, hours, or other work conditions offered are substantially less favorable to the individual than those prevailing for similar work in the local area; (C) if, as a condition of being employed the individual would be required to join a company union, or resign or refrain from joining a bona fide labor organization.

Some state laws require agencies to consider other criteria including: the claimant’s prior training, experience and earnings; the degree of risk to their health, safety, and morals; the distance of the job from their residence; and even their length of unemployment. 

I suggested to my friend that his obligation as the employer would be to provide the local unemployment office with any information regarding the offered work such as return to work date, job title, job duties, the hours of work, wages, location, and any detailed explanation given to him as a reason for refusal.   In doing so, the state agency would have sufficient information to make a determination regarding whether or not the employee’s refusal was for good cause in accordance with state law, and its impact on their eligibility.

Dave Meinert

Director, Product Management, UC Services

Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:36:33 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [0] -
Unemployment Cost Mgmt

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any tax advice in this communication is not intended or written by TALX to be used, and cannot be used, by a client or any other person or entity for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.

Archive
<September 2010>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293012
3456789
Copyright © 2012, TALX. All Rights Reserved. Blog Code of Conduct    \    Privacy Policy    \    Terms and Conditions