Last week, my wife and I celebrated our one year anniversary by taking a trip to San Francisco. We spent a couple of days in the Napa/Sonoma Valley area tasting and learning about wine. Being wine novices, we were pretty fascinated by all the factors that go into the taste and quality of each of wine. It turns out there’s more to making wine than just fermenting some grapes. Not only are there the grapes themselves to consider, but the soil they’re grown in, the amount of moisture where they are grown, and even the elevation. Another major factor we learned was the importance of the type of barrel used. It was interesting to learn how a barrel made from an oak tree in France leads to a different taste than a barrel made from an oak tree in Missouri. This multitude of factors made what seemed to be a fairly straightforward process into something very complex and interesting.

Being the I/Oish person that I am, I found the complexity of factors that go into making a good wine to be not so different from the complexity of factors that go into finding a good job candidate. Now of course I’m not talking about storing candidates in barrels to see how well they age, but often times searching for a quality job candidate is mistaken as a fairly straightforward and obvious process. The truth is that most of the time there are a number of factors that go into what it takes to be successful on a job. As a result, it is important to use appropriate selection tools available to ensure that we’re accounting for these critical factors. This can include assessments, behavioral interviews, job simulations, and other kinds of job related tools. The key is to take the due diligence to appreciate the complexity of truly finding quality job candidates. Without accounting for this complexity we can be left with sour grapes.

Nate Studebaker

I take the same route to and from work every day. I’m sure others have had the same experience, but there are days when I get to work and don’t remember much of the drive. I don’t pay very much attention to my surroundings because the buildings I pass and the streets I drive on don’t change.

One afternoon at work, one of my colleagues (and fellow blogger), Reid, asked me if I had noticed the squirrel statue in the roundabout by our building. (If you aren’t familiar with a roundabout, it’s basically a four-way intersection, but it has a circular roadway around a central island). Even though Reid is a psychologist, I thought he had lost his mind. Surely if there was something as strange as a statue of a squirrel in the roundabout that I go through twice a day I would have noticed it. But sure enough, as soon as he pointed it out to me from our office window, I saw the squirrel positioned right in the middle of the roundabout. I couldn’t believe it and wondered how I could have missed something so obvious. Now I wonder what else I’ve missed not only in my surroundings but in my day-to-day activities as well.

It is easy for work processes to become like my commute – so routine that we switch to autopilot and perform our tasks without even noticing them. When was the last time you systematically evaluated your pre-employment hiring process? If you always go through the process in the same way without really looking at what you are doing, how will you make improvements? If you look for candidates without really thinking about what makes a person successful on the job, what are you missing? Perhaps we should take some time to step back and evaluate our processes and determine what it is that we are really trying to accomplish. We might find something important that needs to be altered (or at least something we hadn’t noticed before) that will help us be more successful. Feel free to call or email us so that pan can help you find your squirrel statue.

Jenni Ginsburg